Federal Judicial Balance and Accountability Act
Circuit Population Balance: Current vs. Proposed
2020 Census Data · District-Level Model Config M · February 2026
2/11In Band
32.1%Mean |Dev|
4.79:1Pop Ratio
14/15In Band
5.7%Mean |Dev|
1.40:1Pop Ratio
Population Equity Metrics
Circuits in ±10% band
2/11 (18%) → 14/15 (93%)
Population ratio (max:min)
4.79:1 → 1.40:1
Mean absolute deviation
32.1% → 5.7%
Maximum deviation
+120.9% → +27.3%
Structural Changes
Regional circuits
11 → 15
States divided
0 → 15
Largest circuit
68.3M → 28.1M
Smallest circuit
14.3M → 20.1M
How to read the cartograms: Each colored square represents approximately
the same number of people. In the current system (left), the Ninth Circuit dominates
the grid — it serves 68.3 million people, nearly five times the First Circuit's 14.3
million. In the proposed system (right), the blocks are nearly uniform in size.
That visual uniformity is population equity.
The tradeoff: Achieving this balance requires dividing 15 states between
circuits at existing federal judicial district boundaries. The Act argues this tradeoff
is justified: equal access to federal justice should not be sacrificed to preserve
nineteenth-century administrative groupings.